Health Care 3.0

Health Care Trends With a Social Media Twist

Ever wonder if having a pet affected respiratory symptoms and infections during the first year of a baby’s life? Recently reported in the journal Pediatrics, researchers say that babies who grow up in homes with a cat or a dog are less likely to get sick than children without pets.

 

Alice Park (@aliceparkny) of TIME posed the question I too wondered; how exactly do pets protect against these diseases? In her July 9, 2012 editorial “Study: Why Dogs and Cats Make Babies Healthier,” she explains that the answer is “not entirely clear, but researchers think that exposure to pet dander, as well as the microbes that pets carry into the home from outdoors, could prime babies’ still-developing immune systems and train them early to fend off assaults from common allergens and bugs, such as from animals or other bacteria and viruses.”

 

Despite the news about Fido and Max, it’s probably not necessary to get a pet to fight infections if you don’t already have one.  The complete study was published online July 9 in the journal Pediatrics.

 

Did you have a pet growing up? Were you sick less than your friends who were pet-free?

Views: 48

Tags: babies, cat, disease, dog, infections, pediatrics, respiratory, study

Comment

You need to be a member of Health Care 3.0 to add comments!

Join Health Care 3.0

Comment by Amanda Griffith on July 12, 2012 at 11:55am

I had cats and a dog growing up and we have a dog now. I don't think I was less sick, because of my ulcerative colitis, but I remember my dad always telling me they'd let our collie share toys with me because her mouth was cleaner than mine!

A community discussing and debating current health care trends, often those involving social media.

Members

© 2013   Created by Palmer Reuther.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service